On 28 abr, 16:06, Salmon Egg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/28/07 9:44 AM, in article > [EMAIL PROTECTED], "War Office" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why can't any of you just discuss the fact that free-fall collapse of > > this building contradicts the laws of physics? > > > Why do you all have to avoid the topic and rather go on a character > > assassination which is totally abhorent to scientific method? > > Sometimes, when I pee into the toilet, a few droplets rise to heights that > defy god's laws. Do I have magic urine?
Was it recorded on video by three different television netoworks? How can we believe you when you have no evidence other than your own testimony to go by? How do you know that you're not mistaken? Have you tested this inquiry scientifically? Is there any way that an independent investigation could repeat and varify the experiemental results you are claiming to have observed? Have you written this down in a careful academically structured thesis such as this one: http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buildings_Completely_Collapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf > > -- If there is such a thing as intelligent design, please explain > hemorrhoids. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
