On 28 abr, 13:56, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 28, 8:44 am, War Office <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 25 abr, 21:33, "Bill Habr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Cal Tech is the ELITE of ELITE in physics. > > > > > If Feynman were alive, he would point his finger straight at the 911 > > > > criminal operators, the yank bastards themselves ....... > > > > >http://www.911blogger.com/node/8101 > > > > > No self-respecting scientist should keep his mouth shut. Its a > > > > fundamental challenge to the method of science, a detective work most > > > > demanding of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY. > > > > Isn't this the guy who has more conspiracy theories than Carter has pills? > > > > Whitewater, Vince Foster, moon landing hoax one week - we found a UFO on > > > the moon the > > > next, Oklahoma City bombing, a new conspiracy every day ad nauseum? > > > Why can't any of you just discuss the fact that free-fall collapse of > > this building contradicts the laws of physics? > > > Why do you all have to avoid the topic and rather go on a character > > assassination which is totally abhorent to scientific method? > > ...because that's all that is left.
But no-one has critiqued Steven Jones' thesis. And this guy Professor Emeritus of Physics concurs with Jones' thesis. I challenge you to find any tenured or emirtus professor who has written a counter thesis to Jones' You realise everyone is still waiting for NIST to publish their final report and that in Dec 2006 they announced that they would investigate the explosives hypothesis as well as thermite to explain the molten steel? So as you can appreciate then this is still a current issue even Officially. Thus your feigned answer "...because that's all that is left" is a lie. Can you show me past threads of your own where you have argued about this Jones' thesis to any detail? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
