On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:39 AM, R.I.Pienaar <r...@devco.net> wrote: > hello, > > ----- "Michael DeHaan" <mich...@reductivelabs.com> wrote: > > > > I've written an application, which aims to solve all of the missing > > peaces > > > around puppet - http://theforeman.org > > > > Ohad, as you've said "I've written an application, which aims to > > solve all of the missing peaces around puppet". Obviously you've done a > > lot of work here, but I need to communicate something from a > > community perspective -- the proper place to fix missing pieces in Puppet > is by > > contributing to Puppet -- our vision is to have no such "missing > > pieces". Hence things done outside of core tend to fragment the > > userbase and make things harder to install/use/manage/maintain. The > > future of this workflow tool is going to be Puppet's Dashboard. > > Where there are barriers to doing this, we will remove them. > > As a non affiliated community member who spend a lot of my time on Puppet I > think this is a particularly unfriendly and in fact alarming statement for > someone from RL to make. > > It also goes against what I saw as a rather wonderful development at Puppet Camp this year, namely puppet evolving to become a viable component of in-house software stacks.
I understand the situation with Foreman and Puppet Dashboard is a little complicated, but it's a good thing to have competition in the Puppet ecosystem. I'm not sure you communicated this "from a community perspective" at all Michael. -- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
