I can change the links on gnu.org to point to a known-good Windows binary, but I don't think it's appropriate to host Windows binaries (or other binaries) at gnu.org.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:48 PM someone <maffyd...@aol.com> wrote: > Aren't the gnu.org pspp download and nightly build pages pointing to pspp > at https://caeis.etech.fh-augsburg.de/ ? So would you have to change to > where they both point? Or could the 1.6 build for windows on the nightly > build page be moved to where the main gnu.org pspp download page points? > > Thanks > > Gene > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Pfaff <b...@cs.stanford.edu> > To: someone <maffyd...@aol.com> > Cc: tuna.is.good.for....@gmail.com <tuna.is.good.for....@gmail.com>; > public....@gmail.com <public....@gmail.com>; pspp-users@gnu.org < > pspp-users@gnu.org> > Sent: Mon, Jun 13, 2022 2:21 pm > Subject: Re: pspp-1.6.0 released, 1.6 windows > > I'm happy to update the webpage to point to a 1.6 build for Windows, if > someone would like to recommend one. > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 9:27 PM someone <maffyd...@aol.com> wrote: > > Hi all > > In my website, https://sites.google.com/site/gsocialchange/statsoft and > in my report https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4105959 > I'd like to list the most recent version on the 'official' or main > download page http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/get.html > > I could list the nightly download page, but I'm much prefer to list the > main download page, especially since the main download page says "The > windows installers for nightly builds are untested nightly builds." > Unless this wording could change? > > thanks > > gene > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Oren Ish-Shalom <tuna.is.good.for....@gmail.com> > To: ft gmail <public....@gmail.com> > Cc: pspp-users@gnu.org > Sent: Sun, Jun 12, 2022 10:41 pm > Subject: Re: pspp-1.6.0 released, 1.6 windows > > The windows installer currently in the pspp download page > <https://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/get.html> > is indeed 1.5 and not 1.6. But the nightly version > <https://caeis.etech.fh-augsburg.de/downloads/windows/pspp-win-daily/1.6.0-gb0c435/pspp-64bit-install.exe> > is available there, > and it is 1.6, so maybe use the nightly version? > > On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 at 22:18, ft gmail <public....@gmail.com> wrote: > > The 1.6 version files down at the bottom of the download list are > [image: [ ]] pspp-1.6.0.tar.gz > <https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/pspp/pspp-1.6.0.tar.gz> 2022-06-01 00:35 9.1M > [image: [ ]] pspp-1.6.0.tar.gz.sig > <https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/pspp/pspp-1.6.0.tar.gz.sig> 2022-06-01 00:35 833 > > > But how to use them with Windows ? > - ftr > > On 12/06/2022 12:44, John Darrington wrote: > > The download page is https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/pspp/ and this most certainly > does have version 1.6 (scroll down to the bottom). > > Perhaps you were looking at a mirror site? (some mirrors are a little slow > getting updated). So I suggest that you try a different mirror or use the > primary download site (above). > > J' > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 10:49:51PM +0000, someone wrote: > Hi all > I hope everyone is healthy! > The website of pspp https://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/ says 1.6.0 has > been released. > I went to the download page and got the version for windows. > pspp-1.5.3-g797d4c.exe. This still seems to be the 1.5 version? At least > when i installed it on my windows pc, and clicked on about, it said version > 1.5. > Any plans for when the 1.6 version for windows to be released? > I know 1.6 is at the nightly untested builds. > Thanks > Gene > > >
