Can you tell is which variable(s) you analyzed using frequencies?

-Alan

On 9/26/2016 9:48 AM, Cecily Ray wrote:
> Thanks to Harry, Ann and John.
>
> There are 109041 respondents (records) in the dataset. 
>
> I am interested in analyzing 1175 of these records having a certain
> response (recoded as a particular variable. I believe no variable has
> more than about 5 or 6 distinct responses (most are not continuous
> variables, certainly not the few of interest). 
>
> Ann, are you saying you have analysed Demographic and Health Survey
> (or National Family Health Survey) data for India? What kind of
> machine did  you use? 
>
> I feel this should run on an ordinary laptop. I closed Chrome and like
> I said, the performance improved but was still slow (got "non
> response"), but got results. Now we shall try some further calculations.
>
> Regards,
> Cecily 
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Harry Thijssen
> <pspp4wind...@gmail.com <mailto:pspp4wind...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     That leaves a few unpleasant options:
>
>     a) the installation is not correct. (Maybe mixed build generations
>     by installing versions from different build generations without
>     removing the old version first).  Unlikely this is the problem,
>     but you can give it a try be removing the directory where PSPP is
>     installed, and install PSPP again (maybe a newer version but I
>     doubt a newer version will make any difference)
>     b) your hardware, especially the harddisk or its driver has a
>     problem. Is it possible to have your hardware checked? However you
>     wrote that you already tried on another laptop (of your daughter)
>     so this doens't look as a likely case.
>     c) you and your daughter have some program on your computer which
>     greatly slows down disk IO. You could check it by testing on a
>     clean installed PC.
>
>     Have fun
>
>     >I have run the same analyses with the same data set with no problems. So 
> I
>     > don't think it's the data set.
>
>     >Ann E. Dunlop, M.A.
>     >Doctoral Candidate,HDFS
>     >Michigan State University
>
>     2016-09-26 10:37 GMT+02:00 Cecily Ray <cecily....@gmail.com
>     <mailto:cecily....@gmail.com>>:
>
>         Dear Alan, Ann and Harry,
>
>         Many thanks for your inputs on my issues of slow PSPP. 
>         I have used the Task Manager as suggested by Alan and 
>         found that often there is an alternation between PSPP 
>         and System Idle Manager using a high percentage of memory. 
>         This happens when PSPP is saying (Not Responding)
>
>         My laptop has 4 GB of memory in two main memory slots, according 
>         to the product specification sheet. 
>
>         If I can get a chance later I will send a screenshot.
>
>         Regards,
>         Cecily Ray
>
>
>         On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Harry Thijssen
>         <pspp4wind...@gmail.com <mailto:pspp4wind...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>             Hi Cecily
>
>             I don't think PSPP is to slow with big datasets. 500 Mb is
>             not that big. I just think you are not working with an
>             optimal configuration.
>
>             The tests Alan suggested would have given more info about
>             the problem so people could give you an advice. May guess
>             at the moment is that you should use  a bigger workspace
>             or have a problem with your tmp files on a slow disk. The
>             later is unlikely as I expect just 1 disk in your laptop.
>
>             Assuming you have a laptop with at least 4 Gb memory I
>             would recommend setting your workspace to 500 Mb or more.
>             You can do this in the syntaxeditor window with:
>
>             set WORKSPACE=524288.
>
>             You can check this with:
>
>             show ALL.
>
>             You find the syntax editor by going in PSPPIRE to the file
>             tab and then syntax.
>
>             If you could tell the exact file you downloaded for your
>             work people could try to find out what is going on and
>             help you.  It would also be usefull if you could post what
>             happens if you change your workspace settings as suggested
>             above.
>
>             Have fun
>
>
>
>
>                 Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 00:08:10 +0530
>                 From: Cecily Ray <cecily....@gmail.com
>                 <mailto:cecily....@gmail.com>>
>                 To: Alan Mead <ame...@alanmead.org
>                 <mailto:ame...@alanmead.org>>
>                 Cc: "pspp-users@gnu.org <mailto:pspp-users@gnu.org>"
>                 <pspp-users@gnu.org <mailto:pspp-users@gnu.org>>
>                 Subject: Re: PSPP not working
>                 Message-ID:
>                        
>                 
> <cafeo8o4pcfgntaocxf0+4mj8itjful7yj0np-myi1qpwy3z...@mail.gmail.com
>                 
> <mailto:cafeo8o4pcfgntaocxf0%2b4mj8itjful7yj0np-myi1qpwy3z...@mail.gmail.com>>
>                 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>                 Alan,
>
>                 Thank you for your helpful replies. I now understand
>                 that PSPP works fine
>                 with smaller datasets than with the large one I am
>                 using. I think I will
>                 have
>                 to go for a trial version of SPSS.
>
>                 Cecily
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 

Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
President, Talent Algorithms Inc.

science + technology = better workers

+815.588.3846 (Office)
+267.334.4143 (Mobile)

http://www.alanmead.org

I've... seen things you people wouldn't believe...
functions on fire in a copy of Orion.
I watched C-Sharp glitter in the dark near a programmable gate.
All those moments will be lost in time, like Ruby... on... Rails... Time for Pi.

          --"The Register" user Alister, applying the famous 
            "Blade Runner" speech to software development

_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users

Reply via email to