On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 04:49:00PM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:32:20PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote: > On 3/3/2016 11:54 AM, Mark Hancock wrote: > > I actually do get the sense that the devs here care about the Windows > > experience, but just don't have the resources to test it. It's also > > been noted that all the devs use some Linux-based OS exclusively, and > > because open source projects naturally are motivated by personal > > priorities, there is an underlying tendency to notice and fix things > > in Linux first. > > I agree (both with this comment and Mark's perception that PSPP could be > seen as "GNU/Linux first"). > > > Well it certainly is true that fixing issues in GNU/Linux has a higher > priority than fixing Windows issues. But that does not make PSPP a linux > first project. If there is a "pecking order" it is something like this: > > 1: GNU > 2: Other Free OSes (including GNU/Linux) > 3: All other OSes (including Windows and some linux based ones) > > This, as Mark kindly posted, is the policy of GNU. PSPP is part of GNU.
This is somewhat theoretical, though. I do not know any PSPP users or developers who run GNU on Hurd. _______________________________________________ Pspp-users mailing list Pspp-users@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
