Hi Ben

Thanks for the comprehensive explanation why CTABLES depend on the ability
to read SPV files. Do I understand correctly that this dependency comes
only from the pivot-function in the SPV file - meaning that you doubleclick
on a table to change pages?

I mean by that the following: The syntax of CTABLES is:
"CTABLES downvariable BY acrossvariable BY pagevariable"
Pages are shown in the SPV file only by doubleclicking and choosing another
page.

The function is a pain anyway because it is uncomfortable and also (at
least for me) not working under all circumstances. So I can confirm Alans
arguments on this although I have no idea why rendering a new page is not
always working.

To come back to the topic of implementing CTABLES:
1. Can we avoid the dependency on understanding SPV if we strip the CTABLES
command of the page function? So to support only 2 dimensions in the
output? This is probably what most users need.

2. Or do you think that is not worth to do, because once the SPV issue is
solved the whole CTABLES output would have to be reprogrammed? Or are there
other functions of the CTABLES command (like plots or graphs) that depend
on the SPV issue, too?

3. As I do not have any knowledge about TABLES: does TABLES have the same
dependencies on pivot and SPV? Would it be a solution to come back to the
proposal of ftr and Frans to opt for TABLES instead of CTABLES?

Matthias Fäth
Im Mediapark 12
50670 Köln
t: 0221-2907973
m: 0171-9832175
e: m.fa...@gmx.de

2015-11-08 23:54 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff <b...@cs.stanford.edu>:

> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 06:20:25PM +0100, Matthias Faeth wrote:
> > I'm not sure if I get the discussion under the label CTABLES here: why
> > should "production jobs" replace CTABLES?
> >
> > Or is it just that there are 3 open topics by now
> > 1. CTABLES
> > 2. Production jobs
> > 3. Reading .spv files
> >
> > and the discussion is on which to focus time and energy?
>
> Production jobs are a separate topic, and John has changed the subject
> for the emails that focus on production jobs (thanks, John).
>
> SPV files have more to do with CTABLES than you may realize.  CTABLES is
> a heavy-duty application of pivot tables.  It relies on a lot of
> features that aren't well documented for SPSS; the various SPSS
> explanations of pivot tables are terribly vague.  The SPV file format,
> however, is a pretty clear specification for how SPSS pivot tables
> really work, and once I came to learn about it in detail I understood
> much better how output formatting really works.  So this is an essential
> building block for CTABLES and will be important for eventually
> implementing it.
>
_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users

Reply via email to