I'm not sure if I get the discussion under the label CTABLES here: why should "production jobs" replace CTABLES?
Or is it just that there are 3 open topics by now 1. CTABLES 2. Production jobs 3. Reading .spv files and the discussion is on which to focus time and energy? Anybody give me a hint, please. Matthias Matthias Fäth Im Mediapark 12 50670 Köln t: 0221-2907973 m: 0171-9832175 e: m.fa...@gmx.de 2015-11-08 8:25 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff <b...@cs.stanford.edu>: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 01:36:01AM +0000, Charles Johnson wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 17:03:01 -0800 > > > From: b...@cs.stanford.edu > > > To: charlesjohns...@outlook.com > > > CC: fhouwel...@email.it; m.fa...@gmx.de; j...@darrington.wattle.id.au; > robe...@consumerscan.ca; news....@free.fr; ame...@alanmead.org; > pspp-users@gnu.org > > > Subject: Re: CTABLES > > > > > > I've done a lot of the work needed to figure out the format of SPV > > > files. I'm working on publishing a format specification. Then I'll > > > work on implementing a reader for it. > > > > That is great news. If you need more files of type SPV/SPO could ask > > another topic of discussion. > > At some point I'll need some more to answer a few lingering questions, > but I can already extract all of the important content. > > > > Would it be useful to add support for SPSS production job files? That > > > would not be hard (much easier than SPV files or CTABLES). I'd need a > > > bunch of examples of the format. > > > > From my point of view, production jobs are very useful to automate > > lengthy and complex processes that are made recurrently. As PSPP add > > more commands, the more useful they will be in the future. > > OK. >
_______________________________________________ Pspp-users mailing list Pspp-users@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
