It wasn't Tony it was his successor from guess where.. yup Scotland.. Gordon Brown... unelected as PM.. .never elected as PM...
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: 28 March 2011 15:04 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Hey, Leland! On 28/03/2011 10:40 a.m., Adam Buckland wrote: > Because the previous government had absolutely no respect for this > country, no regard for our historical standing in the world and > borrowed us into a huge debt crisis through their use of private > finance initiatives for which our children will still be paying for in > the 2040's > > They all had their snouts in the money pit, took the public for granted and > some were surprised when they got kicked out. Tony Blair started well then > got too high and mighty and took the traditional route of high spending / > high taxes... no looking for efficiencies... > > The deal was to get BP back into Libya, and whilst I have shares in them I'm > still disgusted at how they have acted recently... So I was right and it was a matter of protecting UK interests. I'm afraid our republican friends here will *love* Tony's standing on *this* issue. After all, they've held similar positions regarding their own country. Go BP, go! ;c) > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz > Sent: 28 March 2011 13:45 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Hey, Leland! > > On 28/03/2011 05:20 a.m., Adam Buckland wrote: >> Obama didn't sign off on the release of the Pan Am bomber, had no authority >> to do so and would quite frankly of been told to stick it up his bum if he'd >> tried to assume authority over a separate country. >> As a prisoner in Scotland where the crime took place, he was released by the >> socialist govts in Scotland and the UK (though the socialist govt in the UK >> is no more)... >> >> I am ashamed that this happened, he should have died in prison; maybe they >> may accidently find him in Libia and whisk him to Guantanamo... >> >> Adam. > Why do you stress the political orientation of the UK govt at the time? > After all I'm sure it was a matter of political or economic convenience for > the UK, I'm sure our republican friends here will find it normal, after all > they agreed when USA supported all kind of tyrants in the name of furthering > the interests of the US. > >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Michael Madigan >> Sent: 27 March 2011 20:12 >> To: ProFox Email List >> Subject: RE: [OT] Hey, Leland! >> >> Obama signed off on releasing the Pan Am bomber and now he's going after >> Gadaffi. IS this guy Schizophrenic? >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
