Obama didn't sign off on the release of the Pan Am bomber, had no authority to 
do so and would quite frankly of been told to stick it up his bum if he'd tried 
to assume authority over a separate country. 
As a prisoner in Scotland where the crime took place, he was released by the 
socialist govts in Scotland and the UK (though the socialist govt in the UK is 
no more)...

I am ashamed that this happened, he should have died in prison;  maybe they may 
accidently find him in Libia and whisk him to Guantanamo...

Adam.




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Michael Madigan
Sent: 27 March 2011 20:12
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Hey, Leland!

Obama signed off on releasing the Pan Am bomber and now he's going after 
Gadaffi.  IS this guy Schizophrenic? 

--- On Sun, 3/27/11, John Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: John Harvey <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [OT] Hey, Leland!
> To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, March 27, 2011, 2:18 PM
> My understanding is there should be
> an arrest warrant out for the tyrant
> because of the killing of all the passengers of the Pan Am flight. I 
> think they should just assassinate him and save the money.
> 
> John
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf
> Of Ricardo Araoz
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 12:02 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Hey, Leland!
> 
> El 23/03/11 11:15, lelandj escribió:
> > You say patato, I say patattah  LOL.
> Without getting into political
> > science, I was using the more general, (eg Google),
> definition of
> > "Anachy", but thanks for pointing out the many sub
> classifications.
> > BTW, what class of Anachy to you say Libya has become,
> or do you think
> > Libya is simply in a civil war?
> 
> Hi, sorry I'm late but just returned from Uruguay (tomborrow back to 
> work...
> shit!).
> I'd say Libya is in a civil war trying to depose a tyrant.
> BTW, good attitude from USA. Only acting within UN directives and 
> refusing to occupy the country. That's a proper way to intervene in 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to