You do seem to have remarkable trouble with anyone questioning you. You can post all day about minutae and all power to you. But when you talk about angelic free will and buy into the troll argument that began it, your apparent intelligence fails you. You get sucked into every trivial irrelevancy that you feel you are an expert in (almost everything) yet when someone wants to move a topic away from the irrelevant to the hugely relevant, you object. Did you not see that the opening post was an invite to discuss an irrelevancy for the very purpose of denigrating the faith we both hold? The reason I tried to moved it to Grace was to try and take a troll post to a positive one. Congratulations. Your ego and arrogance won. Feel pleased?
Geoff Flight General Manager Sustainable Resources Industry Training Pty Ltd 58 Norrie Ave Clovelly Park 5042 P: +61 8 8277 6380 M: 0414 965 226 F: +61 8 8177 1290 W: www.srit.com.au E: [email protected] TAKE THE SURVEY! http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/976V5JT -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Publius Maximus Sent: Tuesday, 9 November 2010 9:42 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] On christian mythology On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:53 PM, geoff <[email protected]> wrote: > I attack your posts mainly because you use a massive amount of words to > confuse an issue. You attack my posts because you think you're smarter, and hate it when my arguments prove otherwise. So you create a meme -- in the past, it was that "everybody in the world disagrees with you", now, it's "you write massive amounts of confusing text" -- to explain your ineffectual nit-picking. > Take the subject of Grace. It is an inherently simple (and > accessible) concept which you clouded by your many words. You try to make a topic that is about angelic free will about grace, and so my comments on angelic free will you contend confuse the issue of grace. Actually, you just object to my staying on topic and are bummed that you were unable to change the topic by your own literary dysentery. > And if your mean > 'angelic realms' as separate from the more general 'spiritual realm' then > you'd be one of very few who deal in 'wholeness and healing' in this manner. I mean them synonymously. I am still trying to stay on topic, recall. > > You consider yourself superior on the basis of the volume of your words. No, I consider them superior because I actually construct arguments. You wouldn't know modus ponens from a vas deferens. > So > much of scripture and of grace and salvation is essentially very simple. But the subject was the nature of angelic will. Feel free to start your own thread about grace and salvation. > Perhaps occasionally you could remember that. Geoff, you would do well to remember that other people are allowed to talk about things you think are trivial, and you don't have to own a third of the responses just objecting to the topic or how a particular participant writes about it. - Publius > > Geoff Flight > General Manager > > Sustainable Resources Industry Training Pty Ltd > -- "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
