On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:53 PM, geoff <[email protected]> wrote: > I attack your posts mainly because you use a massive amount of words to > confuse an issue.
You attack my posts because you think you're smarter, and hate it when my arguments prove otherwise. So you create a meme -- in the past, it was that "everybody in the world disagrees with you", now, it's "you write massive amounts of confusing text" -- to explain your ineffectual nit-picking. > Take the subject of Grace. It is an inherently simple (and > accessible) concept which you clouded by your many words. You try to make a topic that is about angelic free will about grace, and so my comments on angelic free will you contend confuse the issue of grace. Actually, you just object to my staying on topic and are bummed that you were unable to change the topic by your own literary dysentery. > And if your mean > 'angelic realms' as separate from the more general 'spiritual realm' then > you'd be one of very few who deal in 'wholeness and healing' in this manner. I mean them synonymously. I am still trying to stay on topic, recall. > > You consider yourself superior on the basis of the volume of your words. No, I consider them superior because I actually construct arguments. You wouldn't know modus ponens from a vas deferens. > So > much of scripture and of grace and salvation is essentially very simple. But the subject was the nature of angelic will. Feel free to start your own thread about grace and salvation. > Perhaps occasionally you could remember that. Geoff, you would do well to remember that other people are allowed to talk about things you think are trivial, and you don't have to own a third of the responses just objecting to the topic or how a particular participant writes about it. - Publius > > Geoff Flight > General Manager > > Sustainable Resources Industry Training Pty Ltd > -- "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
