On 15/06/2010 10:31 a.m., Stephen Russell wrote: > 2010/6/15 Ricardo Aráoz<[email protected]>: > >> On 15/06/2010 09:36 a.m., Stephen Russell wrote: >> >>> Why is it Norton? Does it really matter? We all agree that something >>> is better then nothing. >>> >>> >> Sure! We all agree that some poison in our blood is better than nothing. >> And some cancer is much better than no cancer. Don't we? >> > ------------------- > > No we all agree that ANY AV program that is getting updates is better > then none. >
You mean better than AV designed *not* to get updates? And what is the name of this magnificent AV that gets no updates? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
