We get these same spurious claims around the south pacific. There are claims that SOME islands are being inundated by global warming yet others are not. One thing sea level is NOT, is 'picky'. If it was rising EVERYONE would be aware. Sea levels off australia's east coast have risen about an inch in the last 30 years yet a few hundred miles away we are asked to believe the sea has risen a foot or more and still rising. Has it EVER occurred to these alarmists that perhaps these islands are SINKING?? After all, Australia is extremely geologically stable (one of the most stable areas on earth actually) and so we are an excellent control group for sea levels. These islands are sinking - as islands tend to do. Just a bit more of the global hysteria, totally devoid of fact and reason.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Virgil Bierschwale Sent: Saturday, 27 March 2010 4:08 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Island succumbs to rising oceans agreed, except for one minor thing. How do we know that all of the drilling and taking out oil and water aren't displacing things? How do we know that the latest conspiracy theory about our cia inventing some type of earthquake making machines isn't having unintended side effects There are so many possibilities and we won't know which one is correct until history has recorded it. at least that is the way it used to be because now we have countries that are rewriting history. Yeah I know ya'll don't like thinking about anything but the details, and even I will admit that I used to believe everything I read or saw in the media, but the last 9 years or so has taught me well that Tokyo Rose is alive and well in America, and maybe even in all of the countries and now I may be labeled a skeptic, but show me proof first, and by proof, I don't mean proof that scients have knowingly doctored up to lend credibility to their theory. Bottom line, we don't know that island wasnt underwater 1,000 years ago. On 3/26/2010 12:18 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > >> venice is a much different situation as it was already at sea level. >> we have at most, 200 years worth of valid data, and by that I mean >> accurate and something that historians havent rewritten over the centuries >> >> who is to say that in another 200 years we won't be back where we are at? >> >> > Yesterday I met this bloke. He had an ugly face and looked dangerous, > but I told myself - I've only seen him for about a minute, I don't have > enough data to judge him.- > Then he looked at me in an aggressive way, I told myself - It can be > interpreted in many ways, maybe he looks at me this way for some other > reason. - > I saw him curl his fist and prepare a punch and I told myself - Don't > get ahead of yourself, he may be aiming at somebody else, I've only seen > him for 5 minutes, I don't have enough data to know for certain he > intends to hit me.- > After he hit the shit out of me, while I was in the floor bleeding I > understood the old adage that says that if it looks like shit and smells > like shit you don't have to taste it to know it is shit. All these > pseudo-reasons you wave in front of us would be moot if it were YOUR > home, YOUR town, and YOUR family in danger. You'd just be preparing to > get out. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
