there is one major difference.. nuclear scientists did not see the need to falsify data to the best of my knowledge.
Who knows. In another generation or two, nuclear technology might go the way of foxpro and cobol. I have no way of predicting the future, and I'm pretty sure you don't either. On 3/26/2010 3:48 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > >> I've seen so many media propaganda stories these last years that I no >> longer believe anything that I see or hear. >> >> So call me a fool, or a devils advocate or what you will, >> > Will do. > > >> but for me the >> jury is out on this one, not because I'm close minded, but because at >> this point nobody has convinced me that global warming is the cause when >> washington dc was blanketed with snow this year. >> >> > So tell me, who taught you advanced physics and convinced you that there > is such a thing as controlled fusion. > Or you don't believe in nuclear reactors? > Have you seen one? > Have you been inside and checked it was the reactor and not an oil > engine that generated the electricity? > Maybe it's all a scientists conspiracy and there is nothing like > controlled fusion, and the reactors are just a cover up. > How can you be certain? > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
