On 2/11/10 6:43 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Alan Bourke<alanpbou...@fastmail.fm>  wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8509110.stm
>>
>> They're creating their own proprietary internet, you wait and see.
>> --
>
> I wonder how they are going to fund the DELIVERY to end users?  Can
> you see them getting connections to key business campuses but not
> reworking the infrastructure to homes outside of say where Google
> operates in offices?  There are just too many switches between here
> and there that google doesn't own.

I think they could absorb it for the stated 50,000 to 500,000 initial rollout. 
How 
much would it really cost for them to bring fiber to my house from where AT&T 
has 
already brought it to the street corner, about 250 feet away.

Concrete cutters, trenchers, conduit runners, city permits, deal with AT&T, the 
fiber 
and termination equipment. I'd think a team of 3 people could do the work of 
running 
the fiber to my house in about half a day, if they were allowed to backfill the 
cut-out concrete sidewalk with asphalt or something. If not then add a 
concrete-pouring team to the total.

$5K in salaries for the half day, plus parts ($1K?). One *very happy* customer. 
Multiply by 500,000:

$ 2,500,000 cost, 500,000 *very happy* customers, all with friends that start 
demanding the same service from AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, etc...

I think the idea may just be brilliant. And they've thrown hundreds of millions 
if 
not billions of dollars into the wind by now, so it isn't even a drop in the 
bucket 
for them.

Paul

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4b743d76.4020...@ulmcnett.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to