Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Pete - I don't think that kind of Comment from you is advisable in this
> particular message thread - as you are NOW going to push this into [OT]
> territory - and that's AFTER you posted an [OT] message here yesterday
> by mistake AGAIN!
> 
> So - please be more careful of the [OT] stuff - just a friendly
> suggestion...
> 
> :-)

Hi Kurt,

Thanks, friend, I appreciate it. If you saw his post the other day about 
"free Internet in China" or words to that effect, you would see the 
relevance of my post today. This is coming from a man who has suggested 
Internet censorship in the USA on this forum.

Of course, everything he ever posts is deemed appropriate since he is in 
the "ot is OK on nf" clique. Me, though, I get told about it every time 
I reply to his stuff.

Don't worry, I'm used to it. :-)

-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4b7476fa.7020...@verizon.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to