Pete - I don't think that kind of Comment from you is advisable in this
particular message thread - as you are NOW going to push this into [OT]
territory - and that's AFTER you posted an [OT] message here yesterday
by mistake AGAIN!

So - please be more careful of the [OT] stuff - just a friendly
suggestion...

:-)
-K-

-----Original Message-----
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
On Behalf Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:50 AM

Bill Arnold wrote:
> Alan,
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8509110.stm
>>
>> They're creating their own proprietary internet, you wait and see. 
> 
> It seems there are several big players, including those at the country
level
> (Iran, China, others) who are moving in the direction of fragmenting
the
> Internet as we know it today. Another example:
>
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870414010457505762164927015
4.ht
> ml?mod=WSJ-hpp-MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsSecond
> There are 2 possible roads ahead: one that serves people, and the
other 
> that serves power. 

Hi Bill,
Judging from your previous pontifications on *that* topic, you will want

it to serve *people* in China and *power* in the US.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a14071a1...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to