Publius Maximus wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How is the new Health Care bill worse or even different from >> the current system, especially for those with limited >> resources above what their current plan provides, or >> especially for the uninsured of all ages? >> > > Your lack of imagination is stunning. > > Under the current system, if you think a particular insurer sucks > wind, causes needless deaths, and in general is too expensive, you can > leave them and buy insurance from another. You can lead boycotts and > blow whistles and get them put out of business. You are even free to > start your own insurance company if you think you can do better. > > Under the new system it would take an all but impossible 67 Senators > to agree, behind closed doors in smoke-filled rooms and blank checks > undewritten by the ChiComs, to fix a bad decision by the (only, > single) health rationing panel that is set up by government, with no > other means of accountability, political or otherwise. >
67 Senators? So that would be DEMOCRACY at work, wouldn't it? How many senators do you have to have to pass any law? Or...... are you AGAINST DEMOCRACY perhaps? Do you think it does not work? > You tell me which one is going to be less responsive, more autocratic, > and deadly. > You mean to tell us the senate is non-responsive, autocratic and deadly? THE SENATE??? Where is your democratic spirit? Or would you rather have a Noriega ruling your country? --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
