Publius Maximus wrote:
> Of course the irony of this is that the very provision that Reid is
> trying to make reversal-proof by changing Senate rules is the very
> provision that Palin objected to -- the one that basically ensures old
> folks get the short end of the health care resource rationing
> envisioned by the bill.
>
> So she used a metaphor -- death panels -- to describe the
> committee/task force/whatever that decides who gets how much and what
> health care resources (with a pronounced and open preference for
> younger vs. older people) -- and the media get's all technical ("there
> no such term 'death panel' in the bill!")....But, in terms of intent,
> it's not only in there, but also bragged about by top advisers to the
> president, including both John Holdren and Ezekiel Emmanuel.
>
> Hope all you old fogies who don't have years to wait for Supreme Court
> challenges to bubble up through the appellate system have a back up
> plan for survival/life support if this godawful bill becomes law....
Hi Bob,
Actually, the current law wants you to die quickly, even if you are not
sick. There are exceptions for rich people.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
