Stephen Russell wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:25 AM, MB Software Solutions, > LLC<[email protected]> wrote: >> Built this email extraction program (VFP9SP1) to grab email addresses >> out of our client's database. Output is Excel, CSV, and/or DBF. They >> want to use that list of email addresses and mass-email messages (like >> marketing messages) to that list. Clients may have Outlook, but may not. >> >> My first thought is BLAT, but as pointed out here earlier, BLAT may >> choke under heavy load. wwIPStuff I guess is best, as soon as Rick adds >> support for gmail. >> >> Rather than actually execute the emails, I'd rather just create them and >> set them in their Outbox of a local mail client for them to mail after >> confirming themselves. Think of it as them pulling the trigger instead >> of my program. > ------------------------------------ > > > First Q is why use gmail if you are doing this for your company as > advertising?
??? Who said my company was doing this? It's the franchisees in the field, not us at corporate. We're not the sender...the franchisee is. > > wwIPStuff should do what you want with the in house mail system. > > You set up a mailbox for this outbound stuff and wwIPStuff will > validate against it. Aah, and there's where you misunderstood---this is NOT in-house. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
