Malcolm Greene wrote: > Michael, > > Blat is production quality code, has many more options than wwIPstuff, > and has been tested and vetted by a far larger community of developers > than wwIPstuff. wwIPstuff was designed to send the occasional email - > not as the basis for a large volume email solution. > > Given the choice I would choose Blat over wwIPstuff for your bulk > mailings.
I guess to avoid "choking" by BLAT, I could put a small pause between sends. ??? > > Of course, if you can side step any responsibility<g> by placing your > mail output in an Outlook folder and have your user manage the sending, > then go this route! This is exactly what I was trying to do for this!!! ;-) > > Or if your emails are all similar and can be generated using a simple > mailmerge technique, use a 3rd party newsletter service, upload your > mailmerge data to their service, and have their service generate and > send your emails. This is what I would choose for a production system. I built the simple email extraction tool for our 1000 centers; I don't want to get involved with them setting up 3rd party email solutions. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
