Bob Calco wrote:
>> Whoops, never mind. I caught the name of the author, (eg David Duke),
>> which sounded familiar, and came up with this on a Google:
>>
>> David Ernest Duke, born July 1, 1950 is a former Louisiana State
>> representative, a candidate in presidential primaries for the
>> Democratic
>> and Republican parties, and former Grand Wizard of the Knights of the
>> Ku
>> Klux Klan. Wow! LOL.
>>
>> I have a hard time taking seriously anything said by a member, or
>> former
>> member, of the KKK.
>>
>
> The Right Hon. Sen. Byrd (D-WV) excepting, I imagine...
>
Yes, I started to mention Senator Byrd as an exception.
>
>> At least David Duke was up front with the American
>> people about his KKK affiliation, which is more than can be said about
>> most neocons.
>>
>
> Not to mention Barack Obama, with his hidden-in-plain-sight connections to
> murderous ideologies ("Black Liberation Theology"), and domestic terrorists
> (Ayers), and convicted criminals (Rezko), and lobbyists (Jim Johnson), and
> racists (Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam, some of whose members are on the
> Obama payroll), and other assorted hypocrites.
>
Careful Bob or I may have to add some off your accusation about Obama to
the Obama Fight the smears website. It seem a number of bloggers have
been spreading lies and rumor about Obama to try and persuade voter away
from him. Wouldn't you really rather talk about what a wonderful
President John McCain would make than smear Obama. LOL
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/fightthesmearshome/
> BTW, WRT Obama, I see yesterday he took the occasion to chide black fathers
> for being deadbeats, and of course the media was lapping it all up, as if it
> was something new. Bill Cosby wasn't thrown under the black leadership bus
> when he said the same thing, and Clarence Thomas et al. have been labeled
> Uncle Toms for identical views. Except the difference I guess is that Obama
> was promising a bribe for his deadbeat bros: in exchange for doing the right
> thing (i.e., taking care of their kids) Uncle Sam would reward them with
> more handouts.
>
> Well, that's fresh and new! That's real "change"!
>
> Anyway, Leland, I am very proud of you for at least reading the source
> *after* you posted it. That's progress. :)
>
Well, thank you Bob.
Regards,
LelandJ
> - Bob
>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LelandJ
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
