Whoop,  the Jewish Biblical claim to the land of Isreal comes from God's 
promise to Abraham.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/The_Jewish_Claim_To_The_Land_Of_Israel.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/k8gm4

Also

#------------------------------------------
Excerpt:

God's Promise To Abraham:

To confirm to Abraham that his promise would be fulfilled, that there 
would be a future for Abraham in the land of promise, God renewed the 
promise of a son by establishing a covenant with Abraham: "On that day 
the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, 'To your descendants I give 
this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river 
Euphrates'" (Genesis 15:18).

http://www.claudemariottini.com/blog/2008/01/gods-promise-to-abraham.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/6axurb

#-----------------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ


#------------------------------



Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> God's gift of land to the people of Israel come right out of the Old 
> Testament of the Bible.  After Moses' was exile from Egypt. God spoke to 
> Moses in the desert through a burning bush, that Moses should return to 
> Egypt to lead God's people out of their bondage,  and God would write 
> upon the hearts and minds of his people his 10 commandments.  In return 
> for God's people abiding by his 10 commandments, God promised the 
> children of Israel a new land, (eg Nation), flowing in milk and Honey.  
> This was the promise/contract/covenant that God made with the Israeli 
> people, and is the basis of there claim to all there currently held 
> land, as well as all Palestine.
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
>   
>> Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the autocratic/theocratic leader of Iran, believes 
>> that Israel should be wiped off the face of the earth, but I'm not 
>> exactly sure why.  However, this is no more extreme than many Religious 
>> Righters and mega-church evangelicals, that feel the Palestinians have 
>> no rights to life or land necessary to any sovereign nation.
>>
>> The Religious Righters point to the Bible as the source for their 
>> belief, The Bible indicates God made a covenant with the children of 
>> Israel gifting all the holy lands to the Jewish people, including the 
>> land currently claimed and occupied by Palestine.  The Religious Righter 
>> believe that Israel should not concede so much as an inch of land to the 
>> Palestinians, and the Religious Righters have been very generous in 
>> financing Israel settlements in Palestinian territory actively 
>> attempting to eliminate Palestine from the face of the earth.  Until 
>> there is some kind of permanent agreement/contract/covenant between 
>> these two competing factions the middle east will remain in turmoil.  
>> Any suggestion as to a solution?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LelandJ
>>
>> *Mahmoud Ahmadinejad*
>>
>> Bob Calco wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>>>    I'm surprised at how easily character assassination comes to the
>>>> radical right.
>>>>
>>>> -- Ed Leafe
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> And I'm NOT surprised how easily selective outrage comes to Ed Leafe...
>>>
>>> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080615/D91AIUPG1.html
>>>
>>> - - -
>>> WASHINGTON (AP) - Joe Lieberman is fast becoming the Democrats' public enemy
>>> No. 1.
>>>
>>> The four-term Connecticut senator, who came tantalizingly close to being Al
>>> Gore's vice president in 2000, not only has been campaigning for his pal,
>>> presumed Republican nominee John McCain, now he's publicly criticizing the
>>> Democrats' standard-bearer, Barack Obama. Lieberman has strayed before, most
>>> notably switching from Democrat to independent in 2006 to hold onto his
>>> Senate seat after a Democratic primary loss.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Oddly, Lieberman befriended and dispensed advice to Obama when the Illinois
>>> senator arrived in Washington in 2005.
>>>
>>> "We have established a very good relationship," Lieberman says. "I have a
>>> lot of affection for him."
>>>
>>> Call it Lieberman's version of tough love.
>>>
>>> The Connecticut lawmaker is willing to speak at the Republican convention
>>> this summer if McCain asks. He also has been mentioned as a potential McCain
>>> running mate.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Democrats have reason to tolerate Lieberman's actions. If he were to caucus
>>> with the GOP, the balance of power in the narrowly divided Senate would slip
>>> away, especially with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., battling brain
>>> cancer. Democrats need Lieberman to maintain their 51-49 Senate majority.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> There is speculation that if Democrats bolster their Senate majority this
>>> fall, they could seek payback by stripping Lieberman of his Homeland
>>> Security and Governmental Affairs Committee chairmanship.
>>>
>>> While there's no serious talk afoot about punishing Lieberman, Kerry said,
>>> "I can't tell you what happens next year."
>>> - - -
>>>
>>> What his Senate colleagues say regarding his sinful apostasy is outright
>>> generous compared to the message boards at Democratic Underground...
>>>
>>> http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address
>>> =389x3456491
>>>
>>> A representative sample from "Occam Bandage" (reply #6):
>>>
>>> "I'm honestly not sure whether I hate Lieberman or McCain more. And I'm
>>> aware how stupid this is, since Lieberman is a solid liberal on every single
>>> issue not involving bombs. But still, I hate that slimy, hideous-looking,
>>> baleen-toothed ratfucker."
>>>
>>> - Bob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to