On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:32:53 -0400, "Malcolm Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi Bill, > > Like you, I sell a suite of proprietary products built on a huge code > base of FPD, FPW, and VFP code. > > At the moment I'm aggressively studying Python as an alternative to VFP. > While I haven't started to port any of my code yet, I'm beginning to > think that porting my code base may not be the huge effort I originally > feared. Why? Because what makes my products unique is their design and > algorithms, not the actual plumbing. And I don't need to re-invent my > design or algorithms - just the plumbing. > > One of the things I noticed when I moved my FPD/FPW applications to VFP > was how much my code base began to shrink. Partially because I was > cleaning up (refactoring) poorly designed code and partially because VFP > simplified a lot of functionality that I had previously built by hand. > I'm confident that I'm going to see the same type of reduction if I port > to Python - especially in the fringe areas of my application that took > me outside VFP's 'comfort zone', eg. web interfaces, regular > expressions, os interfaces, etc. > > After studying Python and then reviewing my VFP code with a fresh > perspective, I'm surprised about how much VFP 'cruft' is buried in my > code. Cruft that is directly tied to the VFP language or workarounds for > the VFP language vs. code fundamental to my application's logic. > > Bottom line: At this point, without having gotten my hands dirty yet<g>, > I'm a lot more optimistic about the feasibility of porting apps from VFP > to Python than I was several months ago. > > > [excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
