Hi Bill,

Like you, I sell a suite of proprietary products built on a huge code
base of FPD, FPW, and VFP code.

At the moment I'm aggressively studying Python as an alternative to VFP.
While I haven't started to port any of my code yet, I'm beginning to
think that porting my code base may not be the huge effort I originally
feared. Why? Because what makes my products unique is their design and
algorithms, not the actual plumbing. And I don't need to re-invent my
design or algorithms - just the plumbing.

One of the things I noticed when I moved my FPD/FPW applications to VFP
was how much my code base began to shrink. Partially because I was
cleaning up (refactoring) poorly designed code and partially because VFP
simplified a lot of functionality that I had previously built by hand.
I'm confident that I'm going to see the same type of reduction if I port
to Python - especially in the fringe areas of my application that took
me outside VFP's 'comfort zone', eg. web interfaces, regular
expressions, os interfaces, etc.

After studying Python and then reviewing my VFP code with a fresh
perspective, I'm surprised about how much VFP 'cruft' is buried in my
code. Cruft that is directly tied to the VFP language or workarounds for
the VFP language vs. code fundamental to my application's logic.

Bottom line: At this point, without having gotten my hands dirty yet<g>,
I'm a lot more optimistic about the feasibility of porting apps from VFP
to Python than I was several months ago.



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to