On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Paul McNett <p...@ulmcnett.com> wrote:

> Several things make the *nix shell so useful, but mostly it's that there are 
> hundreds
> (thousands?) of shell utilities at your disposal that are designed to do 
> exactly one
> thing very well. They accept, at a minimum, input on stdin and output, at a 
> minimum,
> on stdout, allowing chaining of commands.
>
> The ability to write shell scripts in whatever language you want, invoking 
> other
> scripts in whatever language they are written in also helps.

The core principles of UNIX and Windows are in opposition. There's a
basic difference in attitude.

> For Microsoft to come close to this, they shouldn't be reinventing but 
> embracing and
> extending (I thought they were supposed to be pretty good at that, after all).

Well, they're jumping on the bandwagon of PHP on IIS reading SQL
Server, for example. But it's a pretty muddled message.

> I never understood why MS had to make HTML Help so bloody complex. Why did it 
> need to
> be "compiled", for instance.

Generating the indexes for keyword search, contents, cross-references,
mostly, I suspect. HTML Help had to integrate into applications that
would call out for help in context-sensitive ways, so the application
link had to be matched up with the appropriate page/resource.

It wasn't protecting the content, as HTML Help Workshop has always
come with a decompiler.

I wonder if it was just something that escaped from the lab and
started with "hey, that's cool!" and grew into "what problem can we
make this solve?"

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4vpzztxz+vmlrrio_q3z3tlgt6hhbvwqaeo6fsviaj...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to