> De: Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <postfix-users@postfix.org> > Enviada: 31 de março de 2023 15:10 > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:00:49PM +0100, Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users wrote: > > > Logs of message with success DSN sent: > > Are you sure you syslog system is not dropping some of the log messages? > (A common problem with systemd-based logging). I think not, as I don't see any messages about dropped messages, and that generally only occurs when the messages are all the same. I've cut some messages relative to other emails, though.
> > Mar 31 13:26:19 MAIL01 postfix/lmtp[1444780]: C91CB2217: > > to=<nuno.pere...@realdomain.com>, > > relay=mail01.nortenet.pt[private/dovecot-lmtp], > > delay=3, delays=2.9/0/0/0.07, > dsn=2.0.0, > > status=sent > > (250 2.0.0 <nuno.pere...@realdomain.com> CCo8BWvRJmSwGRYAi7tdOA > > Saved) > > > Logs of message with success DSN not sent: > > > > Mar 31 13:25:43 MAIL01 MailScanner[1402982]: Requeue: E3F7220E5.A2EE1 > > to 048FA228D > > Plus you also have MailScanner messing around with your mail. Why do you say that? You mean that it's changing the messages? > > Mar 31 13:25:43 MAIL01 postfix/lmtp[1448361]: 048FA228D: > > to=<nuno.pere...@realdomain.com>, > > orig_to=<nuno.pere...@virtualdomain.com>, > > relay=mail01.nortenet.pt[private/dovecot-lmtp], > > delay=3.2, delays=3.1/0/0/0.06, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent > > (250 2.0.0 <nuno.pere...@realdomain.com> iPZaA0fRJmSwGRYAi7tdOA > > Saved) > > The second message went through virtual alias rewriting, the first did not. The > final recipient is not equal to the original recipient. My best guess for now is that the virtuals are messing around with notify. Is there any way to put it marking the virtual destination as the final destination, even not being so?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
