Is it the best idea to add a reply-to header to the author on mailing list emails? The problem I see is many people will hit reply in their email client which will create an email from them to the author, bypassing the mailing list.
This has also happened before when someone 'r'eplied to the author.
Unless they remember to manually alter the To: field to keep the conversation on the list, it wont be. Was that the intent?
This (same-domain From: header and DKIM signature) is DMARC damage control.
On 09.03.23 14:58, postfix--- via Postfix-users wrote:
I totally understand the benefit of putting the list address in the From: header. But why does that mean something *HAS* to be put in the reply-to header?
In order for us to be able to reply to the sender off-list, when needed, without manually editing address.
This behaviour is consistent with the former behaviour when headers weren't modified (and thus dkim broken).
reply goes to the sender reply-all goes to the sender and list list-reply goes to the list (MUA must support it). AFAIK mailman does NOT change the Reply-To: if sender sets one. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "They say when you play that M$ CD backward you can hear satanic messages." "That's nothing. If you play it forward it will install Windows." _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
