>>>>> "James" == James B Byrne <byrn...@harte-lyne.ca> writes:
James> On Fri, December 25, 2020 12:43, John Stoffel wrote: >> >> Why don't you setup a local only postfix instance on the same host as >> the application, which only listed on 127.0.0.1:25, which the dumb >> Java app can then send email through *without encryption*, then let >> the local postfix instance do all the hard work of sending the email >> to other servers using encryption? >> >> It seems like the simpler setup to get working right, and gets most of >> the pain in the Java app out of the way. >> >> John >> James> That is reasonable suggestion and is a possibility which I have James> considered several times. However, in this case the James> application is being evaluated for its suitability to replace James> and existing one. Bypassing this particular problem with James> Postfix only exposes the next arising from the application's James> unwillingness to accept our certificates. Sure, then the application is pretty much failing your acceptance tests. *grin*. James> It is established to my satisfaction that this is not a Postfix James> issue. Therefore,this has to be a configuration issue within James> the application itself. If I do not solve it now then at some James> point it is going to cause another problem, likely when we do James> not have the luxury of time to figure it out. Good luck then!
