On 24 Nov 2020, at 15:08, Jaroslaw Rafa <r...@rafa.eu.org> wrote:
> Dnia 24.11.2020 o godz. 14:37:13 @lbutlr pisze:
>>> Only the copy that went through the mailing list has those,
>>
>> No.
>>
>> Please re-read what I wrote.
>
> So, I looked through my archives and found an actual message from this
> mailing list, that someone sent both to me and to list. Below are the actual
> headers in their entirety - sorry for posting long uninteresting stuff to
> the list, but seems there's no other way to demonstrate what I mean. :(
You could re-read what I wrote as I suggested instead of ignoring it completely
and going off on some irrelevant tangent.
Here you go, with notes.
> When I get a message from bob that was also sent
> to postfix-user several things happen.
A message FROM BOB (as in not from the list)
> First, the message has a reply-to: header added for the postfix list. All
Note, the header is ADDED when I get a message FROM BOB.
> mailing lists get a reply-to header added with the list address.
Note, ALL messages directed to a mial list get a reply-to added when I receive
them. Many mailing list do not set this header, or set the list up so that
reply to user is the default.
> Second, the message has a "X-List-name: postfix" added to it regardless of
> who sent it.
Please not the word "added" and the phrase "regardless of who sent it"
> First the message that went through mailing list:
Note that the headers you include have NEITHER a reply-to header NOR an
X-Listname header. Why? Because those are added BY MY MAILSERVER.
> To: Jaroslaw Rafa <r...@rafa.eu.org>, postfix-users@postfix.org
[snip]
> Not any trace of mailing list-specific headers here.
Would you like to read the one header line I left intact and see it that might
indicate the message was sent to a mailing list? Anything there? Anything at
all?
> If I were an average mail user and replied to this message (by using
Not talking about average mail users, Never have been talking about average
mail users. This started by mentioning that s lot of people using procmail
setup their recipes to delete duplicate message. No average users use or ever
used procmail.
> That's the difference I'm talking about all the time.
Here is the sieve block for this list, with comments so that maybe you will
read what I wrote this time.
elsif anyof (header :contains "List-id" "postfix-users",
address ["to", "cc"] "postfix-users@postfix.org") {
# Anyof means it the message has EITHER the first OR the second header (or
both).
deleteheader "Reply-To";
addheader "Reply-To" "postfix-users@postfix.org";
# Adds the reply to header so that replies go to the list
# and removes any previous reply-to header.
addheader "X-Listname" "postfix";
# Adds the header for my sorting routines
fileinto :create "lists";
stop;}
--
Eliot: We'll figure it out. We always do.
Margo: When it's a test to cheat on. Not when we're stuck in some epic fantasy
that likes to behead heroes halfway through season one. If we even are
heroes. We might be comic relief.
