On 24 Nov 2020, at 02:44, Jaroslaw Rafa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 16:29:13 @lbutlr pisze:
>>
>> This is not accurate. First, the direct message almost certainly arrives
>> first.
>
> Unless you use greylisting
That's a whole different issue and anyone using greylisting now I would never
use for email. But it doesn’t matter which message arrives at my server first,
the duplicate gets trashed and the first one goes where it should.
> I'm not talking about client getting confused about threading. I'm talking
> about the fact that when you get only an off-list message and reply to it,
> the reply goes only to the original sender and not to the list,
No, that is not the case. When I get a message from bob that was also sent to
postfix-user several things happen.
First, the message has a reply-to: header added for the postfix list. All
mailing lists get a reply-to header added with the list address.
Second, the message has a "X-List-name: postfix" added to it regardless of who
sent it.
Then, on my client, all the messages that are "X-List-name: Postfix" and are
not archived are shown in a smart mailbox.
> thus messages are missing from thread on the list (thread understood as an
> abstract concept, not a particular implementation in this or that client).
That's not how it works here, and not how it's worked here since I started
using procmail in the late 90s, though now I use sieve.
--
"I can't see the point in the theatre. All that sex and violence. I
get enough of that at home. Apart from the sex, of course." -
Baldrick
