On 20.10.2017 14:43, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:12:17AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > I recommend using real, existent address and check its content once > > upon a time. You don't want to get blocked (see points 2. and 4.) > > Absolutely. This is better than the DISCARD suggestion. I find that > people who ask for "do not reply" addresses usually don't understand > what they are asking for, nor what they will get when they have it.
Depending on the use case, discarding email can be as valid a method as rejecting email. Messages sent by automation- or monitoring-services (Jenkins, Icinga) come to mind. If somebody chooses to reply to these machine-generated notifications, I expect him to manually select a human recipient, or the reply will be silently ignored. -Ralph
