On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:12:17AM +0200,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I recommend using real, existent address and check its content once
> upon a time. You don't want to get blocked (see points 2. and 4.)
2017-10-20 14:43 GMT+02:00 /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk>:
Absolutely. This is better than the DISCARD suggestion. I find that
people who ask for "do not reply" addresses usually don't understand
what they are asking for, nor what they will get when they have it.
On 20.10.17 15:29, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
Do you have maybe other better options? I am open for all nice suggestions.
this one is the best option. Unless you want to face results below
> note that:
> 1. anyone doing address verification will block the address
> 2. systems that block senders who mail nonexistent addresses will block you
> you won't find out you mail nonexistent addresses after mail leaves your
> server, since you reject bounces to that addresses
> 3. anyone getting angry for sending mail from nonexistent address will
> block the address manually
> 4. anyone getting angry for sending mail from nonexistent address may block
> you manually.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Emacs is a complicated operating system without good text editor.
