On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:29:02PM +0200, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> Do you have maybe other better options? I am open for all nice 
> suggestions. :)

I already said what I think is best, so no.  But maybe we don't fully 
know why you're wanting the "no reply" address?

> 2017-10-20 14:43 GMT+02:00 /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk>:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:12:17AM +0200,
> >    Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > I recommend using real, existent address and check its content 
> > > once upon a time. You don't want to get blocked (see points 2. 
> > > and 4.)
> >
> > Absolutely.  This is better than the DISCARD suggestion.  I find 
> > that people who ask for "do not reply" addresses usually don't 
> > understand what they are asking for, nor what they will get when 
> > they have it.
-- 
  http://rob0.nodns4.us/
  Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:

Reply via email to