On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:29:02PM +0200, Poliman - Serwis wrote: > Do you have maybe other better options? I am open for all nice > suggestions. :)
I already said what I think is best, so no. But maybe we don't fully know why you're wanting the "no reply" address? > 2017-10-20 14:43 GMT+02:00 /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk>: > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:12:17AM +0200, > > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > I recommend using real, existent address and check its content > > > once upon a time. You don't want to get blocked (see points 2. > > > and 4.) > > > > Absolutely. This is better than the DISCARD suggestion. I find > > that people who ask for "do not reply" addresses usually don't > > understand what they are asking for, nor what they will get when > > they have it. -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject: