Am 22.05.2016 um 02:07 schrieb Phil Stracchino:
My point stands: Making DMARC failure an automatic reject is a sound policy only if you're OK with losing legitimate mail because it passed through a forwarder who hasn't implemented DMARC yet.
disagree DMARC in it's current definition describe direct mail flows. indirect mail flows are not fully captured now. senders with indirect mail flows should publish p=none but avoid p=quarantine/p=reject ( except: aol / yahoo ) And now p=reject is no longer imaginary. We honor p=reject since months ¹) without major issues at ISP level. Andreas ¹) http://lists.dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/2015-July/003171.html
