On 10/14/15 06:17, Wietse Venema wrote: > Tom Hendrikx: >> The original message as received by postfix has no problems. You could >> try to find the postfix logs for the incoming message by looking at the >> message id in the dspam quarantine, but the bug here is in dspam. > > Perhaps related to this: > > http://marc.info/?l=dspam-users&m=132382086221854&w=2 > > To recap, the problem is that --user argument to the dspam binary > ends up mangled when dspam delivers back through smtp to postfix. Like > so, turning "firmapost" into "??D?n" : > > Dec 13 22:44:01 garbo dspam.cgi: Piping into |/usr/bin/dspam > --deliver=innocent --class=innocent --source=error --user > firmap...@alstadheim.priv.no -d %u > Dec 13 22:44:02 garbo postfix/smtpd[14180]: connect from > localhost[127.0.0.1] > Dec 13 22:44:02 garbo postfix/smtpd[14180]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > localhost[127.0.0.1]: 550 5.1.1 < D n...@alstadheim.priv.no>: Recipient > address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table; from=<> > to=<??D?n...@alstadheim.priv.no> proto=SMTP helo=<localhost> > > But that was in 2011.
I don't think DSpam has updated since *before* 2011. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net p...@co.ordinate.org Landline: 603.293.8485
