On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:07:44PM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/13/15 12:04, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >
> > The local(8) delivery agent is processing a message with an invalid
> > (non-printable) recipient.
>
> Could it be the case that the recipient is unprintable because it was
> originally processed and quarantined by dspam when smtputf8 was active?
Yes, but the question is why your MTA would have accepted such a
recipient. Recipient validation would normally reject non-existent
users whether UTF-8 or ASCII. Have you disabled recipient validation,
or created a wildcard alias that permits all recipients?
--
Viktor.
