Le 6 mars 2015 à 00:48, Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> a écrit : > > All anti-spam tools require configuration and updating. > > Updating (via the FreeBSD ports system or the various linux package > management tools) should be fairly painless for any antispam tool > you choose, or at least they should all have a similar level of pain. > > Amavisd-new does not stand out as particularly difficult to use. > All the antispam tools I'm aware of require some level of expertise > along with periodic care and feeding. > > So mostly "what spam tool do you prefer" is an open-ended discussion > with no real right or wrong, and most folks on this list don't have > time for a pointless argument. > > The one suggestion I have is to use the amavisd-new built-in SPF > tools instead of a separate program. >
Ok Thanks for your answer. We are using a flat file for one server and an integrated PostgreSQL solution for the other. I’ll follow your advice for SPF. Thanks. > > > -- Noel Jones ________________________________________________ «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Your provider of OpenSource Appliances www.osnet.eu ________________________________________________ «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD
