All anti-spam tools require configuration and updating. Updating (via the FreeBSD ports system or the various linux package management tools) should be fairly painless for any antispam tool you choose, or at least they should all have a similar level of pain.
Amavisd-new does not stand out as particularly difficult to use. All the antispam tools I'm aware of require some level of expertise along with periodic care and feeding. So mostly "what spam tool do you prefer" is an open-ended discussion with no real right or wrong, and most folks on this list don't have time for a pointless argument. The one suggestion I have is to use the amavisd-new built-in SPF tools instead of a separate program. -- Noel Jones On 3/5/2015 4:55 PM, b...@todoo.biz wrote: > I am quite surprised that no one has anything to say about this… > > ;-? > > > G.B. > > >> Le 5 mars 2015 à 19:17, b...@todoo.biz a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> I am currently using postfix with amavisd + spamassassin on FreeBSD. >> I have also SPF implemented with some py module. >> >> It is working quite well but I found the management and update of amavisd >> quite heavy ! >> >> >> I wanted to know what you were using out there in order to filter >> efficiently spams ? >> Any new tools with leaner configuration files ? >> >> >> Thanks for sharing your knowledge. >> >> G.B. > > ________________________________________________ > «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§ > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - > ________________________________________________ > «?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§ > ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ > PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD >
