Hello,
Your mileage likely will be different, but I stopped using (content-based)
spam filtering tools altogether several years ago (previously used
SpamAssassin and then DSPAM) in favor of a (rather conservative) set of
Postfix smtpd restrictions (including Spamhaus DNSBL).
One of the reasons was also the level of false positives, management and
user overhead, and some minor issues like lack of proper support and
development of DSPAM.
Despite being conservative, my restrictions seem to be surprisingly
effective and also require almost no overhead. Happily working on several
servers with very different usage/load patterns.
Maybe you should try a similar approach.
Eugene
-----Original Message-----
From: b...@todoo.biz
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:55 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Anti spam filtering tools
I am quite surprised that no one has anything to say about this…
;-?
G.B.
Le 5 mars 2015 à 19:17, b...@todoo.biz a écrit :
Hi,
I am currently using postfix with amavisd + spamassassin on FreeBSD.
I have also SPF implemented with some py module.
It is working quite well but I found the management and update of amavisd
quite heavy !
I wanted to know what you were using out there in order to filter
efficiently spams ?
Any new tools with leaner configuration files ?
Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
G.B.
________________________________________________
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD - BSD -
________________________________________________
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD
