>in context of "the spam detector" you need to name it >"GTUBE not supported by postfix filters" makes no sense without naming the filter
Right. It's spamassassin. Thanks. >don't do that - depending on... I am not sure I follow. Don't do what? I am saying here that my header checks do not work and all the spam is coming in right through without ever being rejected, discarded and so on. I am safe in terms of jail :-) because again it doesn't work. Plus, it sounds a little weird to me that any "country and context" may charge you with a crime for just discarding an email. This is my private property and I may charge them back for trespassing for example, which is much more serious then discarding an email. There are countries with rules where you first have to receive prior written consent form the receivers before sending them any commercials, ads and so on but this is never charged criminally, they only administratively charge you (fine that is) if you do not follow these rules and only IF it is proved. Every person in the world in considered innocent unless PROVEN otherwise. But never mind as these are just my comments spoken out loud, plus it has nothing to do with Postfix and this is not a law forum :-) -- View this message in context: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/header-checks-not-working-tp36845p70616.html Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
