>run the spamfilter after queue >http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html
Thanks. Will double-check on that. Chances also are that I missed something too or I might as well have to try to switch to these milters as running SA daemonized doesn't work. I posted my main.cf and my master.cf a bit earlier in this post if you are interested to take a look. >if you run SA as milter header_checks are mot involved at all because the message is rejected before it >ever touchs header_checks I do not run SA as milter, I run it demonized and my rules do not work despite the fact that they pass the tests like these (/example/): postmap -q "Subject: Viagra/" regexp:/etc/postfix/spamdiscard DISCARD *Spam* rule (/example)/ is /^Subject: Viagra/ discard *Spam* >if you are the mailadmin for other users and accept a message with "250 OK" but >silently drop it in germany you hit the same law than a postman standing in >front of your house saying "oh no, i just put that letter in the basket" That's an interesting concept. I would say that 250 OK does not really confirm reception. Even if you request delivery receipt / read receipt does not necessarily confirm that a receiver actually read and understood what was written in that email. Any good lawyer will prove it literally in seconds and also prove that a person accused is not guilty. This is a sieve law in my opinion but I will not argue / dispute on it. You have it this way in Germany and it's not for me to criticize. If your government considers it right so it is. There are many laws that have "holes" in them to be used to a culprit's / defendant's advantage. I think this is a very clear example. >just because the sender can proofe that your server accepted the message >but the RCPT never saw it and in case it was a false positive but important >business mail leading to lose money for whatever reason you are guilty The server is not a person. The server may have accepted the message but the person may have never even seen it. The server (machine) cannot be substituted for a person. A mail man standing in front of your door receives a receipt signature from a /live/ person in person and live so to speak. This is the only evidence accepted. I think that if a delivery receipt was received from a robot (server), not a live person, it would NOT hold enough testimony that a live person was involved at all. It would definitely not be the case in our country and by no means would ever be regarded as the only truth averment. -- View this message in context: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/header-checks-not-working-tp36845p70628.html Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
