> Wietse: >> Marcus: >>> Wietse: >>> You need to use a more efficient implementation. Why do you need a >>> UNIX-domain server in the first place? >> >> Because that's the only way I could think of that would work given that >> the solution must work with pseudo-random transport. >> >> I'm after something that works as follows >> # sometimes 'example.com' is sent down 'foo' and other times it's >> # sent down 'bar' >> example.com foo: >> example.com bar: > > Looks like the proposed randmap that was discussed a week or so ago.
Or maybe `recipient_dependent_default_transport_maps` :-)
