Marcus:
> > You need to use a more efficient implementation. Why do you need a
> > UNIX-domain server in the first place?
>
> Because that's the only way I could think of that would work given that
> the solution must work with pseudo-random transport.
>
> I'm after something that works as follows
> # sometimes 'example.com' is sent down 'foo' and other times it's
> # sent down 'bar'
> example.com foo:
> example.com bar:
Looks like the proposed randmap that was discussed a week or so ago.
In that thread, the MySQL RANDOM() function turned out to be a
usable alternative.
> > - Use a persistent server.
> such as?
If you're worried about performance use a server that doesn't close
the connection after every response. A server that creates one
process per query is even worse and should not be used at all.
Wietse
