On 2012-10-21, Jim Reid <j...@rfc1035.com> wrote: > > Please take your religious debate elsewhere as it's no longer > relevant to this list. Thanks.
If you perceive RFC compliance as a religious matter, please feel free to disregard this thread. Thanks. To be clear, the hot-headed remarks that endorse using IP addresses as a sole criteria for spam treatment so far have failed to put forward any compelling rationale as to why that approach is higher quality than one that takes content and other factors (along with IP address) into account. The logical debate to this point have not favored proponents of the two crude and sloppy techniques that I mentioned. But, I'm open for good rationale; both for my benefit and the OPs.
