On 10/20/2012 03:14 PM, Mike's unattended mail wrote:
On 2012-09-21, Mikkel Bang <facebookman...@gmail.com> wrote:
What are these more intelligent, less crude techniques you talk about?
* content analysis (high quality but computationally costly)
* greylisting
crude and sloppy cost-cutting approaches:
* dnsbl
* reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
I am curious how you arrive at this blatantly provocative judgement.
DNSBLs are recommended by just about everyone who is serious about
email, and a proper EHLO is actually an RFC requirement.
This makes me wonder if it isn't you who represents some sort of
ulterior agenda.
--
J.
