On 2012-10-20, peter evans <pe...@ixp.jp> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 01:14:19PM +0000, Mike's unattended mail wrote: >> From: Mike's unattended mail <mike.thomas-dlre...@cool.fr.nf> > > I think that about says how much value your opinions have. > >> * dnsbl > > If it is good enough for the whitehouse, it is probably good > enough for you. > > IMHO, troll flavoured word salad and not worth even this response.
You're the first to post an ad hominem, without so much as even bundling it with a single logical argument. Your whitehouse remark is an illogical "appeal to authority". You're actually the only one to have a post that's unworthy of response. I spotlight this to give you an opportunity to come up with something that is at least logical.
