> * Mark Alan <va...@e-healthexpert.org>: > > > > Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the > > > > newest Postfix 2.8? > > > > > > http://debian.incertum.net/ > > > > Thank you, but the emphasis in my question was in 'reliable'.
And that was the answer you got. > > A quick diff between the 2.8 sources and patches at > > http://debian.incertum.net/ and the originals at > > http://www.postfix.org/download.html > > showed significant differences that are not Debian related. > > > > As such and for now http://debian.incertum.net/ must be seen as > > its latin name implies incertum (=uncertain, irregular, > > unreliable) If you're capable of determining that Stefan is unreliable, you should also be capable of building your own reliable package, or that's what I'd expect, anyway. On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:22:52PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > Have you asked what the changes are for? > > I do know Stefan Förster, the guy who runs incertum.net, personally > and I consider him to be a highly responsible and trustfull person, > who acts very reliable. Likewise. He has a good understanding of Postfix and how it works. I would suggest to the OP to be more methodical in evaluating the advice you receive. We geeks like to make jokes with our personal / vanity domain names. You can see Stefan's participation right here on this mailing list, using Google searches of the list archive. I think that would be a better method of evaluating him, than by taking his joke literally. > If there are "significant differences that are not Debian related" > Stefan certainly has had reasons to add them. And I'm sure he'd be willing to discuss those reasons. -- Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
