Le 04/01/2011 22:24, Noel Jones a écrit : > On 1/4/2011 3:04 PM, pf at alt-ctrl-del.org wrote: >> >> I'm trying to stop the chain of: >> Sender calls recipient, recipient calls their tech, >> recipient's tech calls me... Then I tell them to contact the >> sender's admin... Then the sender's admin claims that >> "everyone" else accepts their email, even though they don't >> have any reverse dns, and suggests that I add an exception for >> their servers. >> >> I would hope that occasionally someone in that chain would >> notice the url and read it, saving everyone else's time. >> I rarely get "why are you blocking me?" for rbl listed >> domains, so I'm guessing that those client specific self >> service urls do provide some benefit. > > > There won't be reject-specific text anytime soon; the effort is just too > high. Implementing custom text for just a few reject_* restrictions > would raise false expectations, and is unlikely to be implemented > judging from past half-solution proposals.
I would love it if the client IP could be included in the message. This is useful because the guy at the other end doesn't necessarily knows which IP contacted us; and the IP syntax doesn't cause problems with URLs. (well, I am also saying this because almost all of my rejections are based on the IP reputation). but a static text is ok for me. > > A "generic" self-help web link that refers them to match the first part > of the reject message with a list of possibilities should be > sufficient. I believe this to be a fairly common practice already. > > > > -- Noel Jones
